Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Sabin Abrams, et al v. Michael Aguirre, et al
as 08-56691
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SABIN M. ABRAMS, ALBERT ACKERT, JAMES ACKLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL AGUIRRE, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CITY EMPLOYEES, San Diego City Employees' Retirement System and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv12034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shenoy v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority et al
as 3:2008cv00125
Plaintiff:
B. Vittal Shenoy
Defendant:
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, Mercy Health Services Inc, Mercy Hospital Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rockwell et al v. City of Garland, Texas et al
as 3:2008cv00251
Plaintiff:
Richard Rockwell, Richard Rockwell, Richard Rockwell and others
Defendant:
City of Garland, Texas, William H Brown, D J Scicluna and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv01599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
