Cases 41 - 50 of 3,383
Woods v. Store Front/ Valley Behavioral Health
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Terryett O. Woods
Defendant:
Store Front/ Valley Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Tire Town Auto LLC v. Wood County
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Tire Town Auto LLC
Defendant:
Wood County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carlock v. Harper Woods, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11122
Plaintiff:
James Carlock
Defendant:
City of Harper Woods, Glen Heaney, Matthew Closurdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Grady et al v. Wood County, West Virginia
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Grady and Kenneth S. Grady
Defendant:
Wood County, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe 2 et al v. New Mexico State University et al
as 2:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 2 and Jane Doe 3
Defendant:
New Mexico State University, New Mexico State University Board of Regents, Joseph Berning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
