Cases 51 - 60 of 9,404
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NFN et al v. Andrews
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Le'taxione NFN and MS
Defendant:
Heather Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03176
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. The Salvation Army et al
as 2:2024cv07336
Defendant:
Backlash, Moving Forward Worship Center, Shamrock Apartments and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05908
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Hill v. Pepsi Corporation
as 3:2024cv02182
Defendant:
Pepsi Corporation
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Civil Disabilities Act
Kotevski v. Clinton et al
as 2:2024cv00622
Defendant:
Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber bin Mohammed bin Thani Al Thani, Alphabet Inc., Cox Communication Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAPP v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
ANDREW A SAPP
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quinn v. United States Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2024cv02374
Defendant:
Cricket, Topeka Police Department, Kansas City Missouri Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
