Cases 51 - 60 of 3,364
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv02365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Victora Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt et al v. Clive Davis et al
as 2:2024cv03187
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Clive Davis, Saviii 3rd, The Diamonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Belle Shore Condominium LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02414
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Belle Shore Condominium LLC, Delkap Management, Inc. and Joei Losito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Berstler (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Christina Garcia Berstler
Defendant:
Taco Bell and No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aiken v. Bell et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Aaron Aiken
Defendant:
Trooper Cameron Bell and Mississippi Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
