Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Kennaday v. Clinton et al
as 6:2014cv00054
Defendant:
Jr George Bush, Laura Bush, Bill Clinton and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Kennaday
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Director, Office of Science and Technology Behavioral Modification Unit et al
as 1:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Director, Office of Science and Technology Behavioral Modification Unit, Director, Office Science & Technology Policy, Sloviter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Demtrius et al v. Yetes et al
as 3:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
Flowers Demtrius, Mikal Yetes and Sandra Elmond
Defendant:
Barack Obama and Michelle Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Obama, et al.
as 1:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Brennan Love Ball
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama and Michelle Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Enshes v. The Knights Templar et al
as 2:2012cv02730
Plaintiff:
Linda Yvetta Enshes
Defendant:
The Knights Templar, CIA, Scottish Rite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kamal Roy v. USA, et al
as 12-2209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL K. ROY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FACEBOOK, TWITTER and others
Todd v. FBI et al
as 1:2012cv03290
Plaintiff:
Ethel Todd
Defendant:
FBI, CIA, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Michael Atraqchi, et al v. USA, et al
as 12-11432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL R. ATRAQCHI and IRENE S. ATRAQCHI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARACK OBAMA, MICHELLE OBAMA and others
Michael Atraqchi, et al v. USA, et al
as 12-11021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL R. ATRAQCHI and IRENE S. ATRAQCHI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARACK OBAMA, MICHELLE OBAMA and others
Mathis v. Obama et al
as 2:2012cv00173
Plaintiff:
Michelle Mathis
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Shawn Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
