Cases 51 - 60 of 96
Jerry Lum, et al v. County of San Joaquin, et al
as 12-15979
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JERRY LUM, individually and as successor of interest to Jeremy Lum and DOROTHEA TIMMONS, individually and as sucessor in interest to Jeremy Lum
Defendant - Appellant:
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, CITY OF LATHROP, RAY WALTERS, Sergeant and others
Stark v. NaphCare, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00783
Plaintiff:
Sharon Kay Stark
Defendant:
NaphCare, Inc., Jackie Shrader, Carol Hubbard, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nemeth v. Village of Hancock
as 11-3504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Nemeth, Donna Nemeth and Valerie Garcia
Defendant - Appellee:
Village of Hancock, Robert Davis, James Rotzler and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nemeth v. Village of Hancock
as 11-531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Nemeth, Donna Nemeth and Valerie Garcia
Defendant - Appellee:
Village of Hancock, Robert Davis, James Rotzler and others
Nemeth et al v. Village of Hancock et al
as 3:2010cv01161
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nemeth , Donna Nemeth and Valerie Garcia
Defendant:
Village of Hancock, Robert Davis, James Rotzler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3369
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv04946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kain v. Eden Prairie, City of et al
as 0:2010cv01740
Plaintiff:
Robyn Melissa Kain
Defendant:
Eden Prairie, City of, Jesse A. Irmiter and Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
