Cases 51 - 60 of 116
McConville v. Montrym et al
as 3:2015cv00967
Plaintiff:
Martha McConville
Defendant:
Jeremy Montrym, Jennifer Young , Jennifer Wintermute and others
Cross_claimant:
Michael Amato , Shawn Byrne , County of Montgomery and others
Cross_defendant:
Jeremy Montrym and Jennifer Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery et al
as 6:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, Reese McKinney and D.T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenfield v. Amato et al
as 6:2014cv01045
Plaintiff:
Charles Greenfield
Defendant:
Michael Amato , Michael Franko and The County of Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROACH et al v. LOHORN et al
as 1:2014cv01196
Defendant:
DAVID A. AULT, CITY OF CRAWFORDSVILLE, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES and DAVID ROACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. Amato
as 14-2133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Luis A. Torres, Sr., as the Administrator of the Estate of Luis A. Torres, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Amato, Jeffrey Smith, County of Montgomery and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
James Williamson v. County Montgomery
as 14-20285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. WILLIAMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY
MEISLER v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2014cv01512
Plaintiff:
SHARON R. MEISLER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and KEIR BRADFORD-GREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Williamson v. County Montgomery
as 14-20104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. WILLIAMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY
Harrison et al v. City of Amsterdam et al
as 6:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
Kristi M. Harrison and Julio V. Morales
Defendant:
City of Amsterdam and County of Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
