Cases 61 - 70 of 11,607
JONES v. SYMONETTE et al
as 2:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
ELAINE JONES
Defendant:
ALLAN A. SYMONETTE, BOISE BUTLER, JAMILLA HASBEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hanna v. Baltimore City Board of Elections et al
as 1:2024cv01537
Plaintiff:
Will J. Hanna, II
Defendant:
Baltimore City Board of Elections, Armstead Jones, Maryland State Board of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Vasek v. Barnett et al
as 6:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
James L. Vasek
Defendant:
Dolores June Barnett, Jeffrey Sharp, Thomas Phillip Eitel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthew Jones v. Central District Station
as 24-7083
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Central District Station
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Palato v Cook et al
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Fred Palato
Defendant:
Michelle Cook, Deputy Nathan K Jones, Deputy Tyler R Giebeig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Singleton et al v. Clark County et al
as 3:2024cv05392
Plaintiff:
Dalynne Singleton, JM, SM and others
Defendant:
Clark County, NaphCare Inc, Alyssa Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hulse et al v. American Fork Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Stephen Hulse and Kalie Jones
Defendant:
American Fork Police Department, RJ Bibeau, FNU Blackbern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
