Cases 61 - 70 of 633
Allen v. City of Kennett et al
as 1:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
David Allen
Defendant:
City of Kennett, Aaron Mays, Kenny Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clervrain et al v. Brimmer et al
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Wislene Casy and others
Defendant:
Philip A. Brimmer, David DLG Atalig, Tom Kucharski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Haget et al
as 2:2022cv02225
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Tre Haget, Christopher Erlewine, John E. Hyten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BAILEY v. JENNINGS COUNTY et al
as 4:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
DANA BAILEY
Defendant:
JENNINGS COUNTY, JENNINGS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ALLEN RITCHIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA LEE SMITH
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JAMEY NOEL, DONOVAN HARROD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WHITE v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
BRENDEN MARNAE WHITE
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JAMEY NOEL, JEFFERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
