Cases 61 - 70 of 105
Jones et al v. King et al
as 4:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Ysidro Renteria and William L. Jones Carr
Defendant:
Amber M. King, Chris H. Busse and Brandon W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Maine State Police Department
as 22-1638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
MAINE STATE POLICE and MAINE STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Jones v. Portland Maine Police Department
as 22-1639
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
PORTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Jones et al v. Child Safety and Family Services et al
as 2:2022cv01129
Plaintiff:
Teresa Jones and Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Child Safety and Family Services, Olivia Groby and Sherri Krismann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. MAINE STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
MAINE STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JONES v. PORTLAND MAINE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
PORTLAND MAINE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wolfgang Mountford v. City of Santa Monica et al
as 2:2020cv07220
Plaintiff:
WOLFGANG MOUNTFORD
Defendant:
ELOY RODRIGUEZ, CITY OF SANTA MONICA, MATTHEW JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Deputy Attorney General Valerie Farnan et al
as 1:2020cv00818
Defendant:
Deputy Attorney General Valerie Farnan, Deputy Attorney General Loren Holland and Deputy Attorney General Monica Horton
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. Capiro
as 1:2019cv00895
Defendant:
Dr. Jose Capiro
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. Thomas
as 1:2019cv00896
Defendant:
Officer William Thomas
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
