Cases 61 - 70 of 3,084
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Mishelow et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Jason Mishelow, Thomas McAdams, Jessica Marquez Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De Avila v. Murphy et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Jamie de Avila
Defendant:
Timothy Murphy and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hassler v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Gina Hassler
Defendant:
The City of New York, Akila Nanayakkara and Edward Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Porter v. Murphy et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter
Defendant:
Kevin Murphy, Mary A. DeBoer, Gary S Germann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PITTMAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
MARLENE V. PITTMAN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lucas et al v. Lawrence et al
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Deondrick Lucas, Tory Minton, Seyveyon Moore and others
Defendant:
Troy Lawrence, Jr., Paul Murphy, Baton Rouge Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
