Cases 61 - 70 of 1,704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Victor Couzens, et al v. City of Forest Park, OH, et al
as 23-3930
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PASTOR VICTOR S. COUZENS
Plaintiff:
INSPIRATIONAL BIBLE CHURCH
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF FOREST PARK, OH, COLONEL WILLIAM ARNS, In his official capacity, REBECCA EAVERS, In her official and personal capacities and others
Powell v. New York City Comptroller
as 1:2023cv10095
Plaintiff:
Claude O. Powell, Jr.
Defendant:
New York City Comptroller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CUMMINGS v. BIRDSEYE et al
as 1:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID CUMMINGS
Defendant:
SARAH BIRDSEYE, SARA ANDERSON, AJ BUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv03069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal-Americans with Disabilities Act
Johnson v. Rogers
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Cathy Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Sharli Powell Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sheronda Powell v. Doane University
as 23-3428
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sheronda Powell
Defendant / Appellee:
Doane University
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv09412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
