Cases 71 - 80 of 24,189
Johnson v. Palm Bay Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Timothy E Johnson
Defendant:
Palm Bay Police Department, Agent Tony Williams, Officer Breet Naymik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ellis Jr. v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Guy Ellis Jr.
Defendant:
Angela Sandoval, John Tekin, Dea Zantow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivers v. South Mountain Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Keith Rivers
Defendant:
South Mountain Justice Center, Viswanath Dhyaram, Brian Crimp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Delfino et al. v. Summit County, Ohio
as 5:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
Daniel Delfino, Mindy E. Delfino and State of Ohio
Defendant:
Summit County, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mandry-Mercado v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Javier E. Mandry-Mercado
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Victor Fingerhut-Mandry and Salvador Mandry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant:
GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Wah v. Vargas et al
as 1:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Hop Wah
Defendant:
Javier E. Vargas, Antonolla Papaloo, Nicole Wint-Baksh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
