Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 318
Oregon Firearms Federation, Inc., et al v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-36011
Plaintiff / Appellant: OREGON FIREARMS FEDERATION, INC., an Oregon public benefit corporation, BRAD LOHREY, Sherman County Sheriff, ADAM JOHNSON, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee: KATE BROWN, Governor of the State of Oregon and ELLEN ROSENBLUM, Attorney General of the State of Oregon, in both their official and personal capacities
Gazzola v. Hochul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-3068
Plaintiff / Appellant: Nadine Gazzola, individually, and as coowner, President, and as BATFE Federal Firearms Licensee Responsible Person for Zero Tolerance Manufacturing, Inc., Seth Gazzola, individually, and as coowner, Vice President, and as BATFE FFL Responsible Person for Zero Tolerance Manufacturing, Inc., John A. Hanusik, individually, and as owner and as BATFE FFL Responsible Person for d/b/a AGA Sales and others
Defendant / Appellee: Kathleen Hochul, in her Official Capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Steven A. Nigrelli, in his Official Capacity as the Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police, Rossana Rosado, in her Official Capacity as the Commissioner of the Department of Criminal Justice Services of the New York State Police and others
Junior Sports Magazines Inc., et al v. Rob Bonta, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-56090
Plaintiff / Appellant: JUNIOR SPORTS MAGAZINES INC., RAYMOND BROWN, CALIFORNIA YOUTH SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and DOES 1 - 10
Amicus Curiae: SECOND AMENDMENT LAW CENTER, JEWS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FIREARM OWNERSHIP and CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
Oregon Firearms Federation, Inc. et al v. Brown et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01815
Plaintiff: Oregon Firearms Federation, Inc., Brad Lohrey, Adam Johnson and others
Defendant: Governor Kate Brown and Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum
Consolidated Plaintiff: Oregon State Shooting Association, Mazama Sporting Goods, Tim Freeman and others
Amicus Curiae: Oregon Hunters Association, Gun Owners of America Inc., Gun Owners Foundation and others
Consolidated Defendant: Terri Davie and Ellen F Rosenblum
Intervenor Defendant: Oregon Alliance for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gray et al v. Kathy Jennings
as 1:2022cv01500
Plaintiff: Gabriel Gray, William Taylor, DJJAMS LLC and others
Defendant: Kathy Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CALABRESE v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv06557
Plaintiff: NINO CALABRESE
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Verma v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01229
Plaintiff: Rakesh Verma
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms Explosives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell v. Garland et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff: James Paul Howell
Defendant: The Federal Bureau of Investigation, The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Randeep Mann v. USA, et al
as 22-5286
Plaintiff / Appellant: Randeep Singh Mann
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Office of Attorney General, Attorney General and others
Cargill et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01063
Plaintiff: Michael Cargill and CTC HGC, LLC
Defendant: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Steven Dettelbach, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 923 - Review of Firearms Licensing

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?