Cases 71 - 80 of 2,024
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CUMMINGS v. BIRDSEYE et al
as 1:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID CUMMINGS
Defendant:
SARAH BIRDSEYE, SARA ANDERSON, AJ BUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Graham Schiff v. Anthony Brown
as 23-2219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland Attorney General, JOHN MCCARTHY, Montgomery County State's Attorney, NICHOLAS PICERNO, Captain for Montgomery County Police and others
Cocroft et al v. Graham et al
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Clarence Cocroft and Tru Source Medical Cannabis, LLC
Defendant:
Chris Graham, Pat Daily and Dr. Daniel P. Edney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GRAHAM v. FEMA et al
as 2:2023cv04294
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN GRAHAM
Defendant:
FEMA, CITY OF PHILA., PHILA. POLICE DEPT. HEADQUARTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRAHAM v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04291
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN GRAHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS, PHILA. POLICE DEPT. 39TH DISTRICT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv05934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
