Cases 71 - 80 of 2,121
Sharp v. The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Sharp, Jr.
Defendant:
The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department, Stephen Irwin and Joshua Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keaugntey Hughes, et al v. Nicholas Herbster, et al
as 23-3122
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KEAUGNTEY HUGHES and G. B.
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS HERBSTER and ABIGAIL ROBERTS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
D. Diaz v. Michel Rey Moore et al
as 2:2023cv10018
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welfel v. Wilkes Barre Police Drug Task Force et al
as 3:2023cv01958
Plaintiff:
William John Welfel
Defendant:
Wilkes Barre Police Drug Task Force, Pennsylvania State Police Vice Squad, Officer Conoboy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Earvin v. Magnit/Pro Unlimted, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Hughes Earvin
Defendant:
Magnit/Pro Unlimted, Inc., Electronic Arts, Cigna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
