Cases 71 - 80 of 6,809
Wexler et al v. Lawyers for Children, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04947
Defendant:
Lawyers for Children, Inc., Lisa Lubell, Linda Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Linnea Wexler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Hicks et al
as 0:2024cv02468
Defendant:
Amber Suronen, Kevin Barnes, Octavia Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Abraham Sigurd Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06655
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Griffin v. US Bankruptcy Court - KY, Judge et al
as 1:2024cv00239
Defendant:
James F. Guilfoyle, Dietz, Shields & Freeburger LLP, The Law Office of James Guilfoyle and others
Plaintiff:
John M. Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04593
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06617
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson et al v. Mawr
as 1:2024cv11984
Plaintiff:
Lisa Robinson and Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc.
Defendant:
Colonel John Mawr, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05358
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
