Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02948
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rayford v. Gusman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02823
Plaintiff: Willie Rayford
Defendant: Sheriff Gusman, L. David and L. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv13122
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01139
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01189
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv02873
Plaintiff: ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, FRAZIER LYDE, PECHKURO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00447
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1454
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00002
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Mattox et al v. Medders et al
as 6:2009cv00216
Plaintiff: Brady Mattox, Harlan Linker, Rayford Bratcher and others
Defendant: John F. Medders, Jr. and Latimer County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?