Cases 71 - 80 of 94
McGuire v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2011cv02344
Plaintiff:
John Patrick McGuire
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice , Joseph Russinello , U.S. Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McGuire v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2011cv02344
Plaintiff:
John Patrick McGuire
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice , Joseph Russinello , U.S. Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00562
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USATT:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv60597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Michael Schmidt v. James Creedon, et al
as 10-1633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES P. CREEDON, CONNIE A. TENNIS, RICHARD S. SHAFFER and others
Barnett v. United States Tennis Association
as 2:2009cv01060
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Barnett
Defendant:
United States Tennis Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CSZ et al v. United States Tennis Association et al
as 2:2009cv00194
Plaintiff:
CSZ and Elizabeth A. Zachary
Defendant:
United States Tennis Association and The Mississippi Tennis Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Michael Schmidt v. James Creedon, et al
as 09-2051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES P. CREEDON, CONNIE A. TENNIS, RICHARD A. SHAFFER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv03816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
