Cases 81 - 90 of 98
Field et al v. McMaster et al
as 6:2009cv01949
Plaintiff:
Arthur M Field, Kathryn Taillon, T Bart Kelley and others
Defendant:
Henry D McMaster, William J Condon, Jr, Tommy Windsor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Khanukayev v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv06175
Plaintiff:
Mikhail Khanukayev
Defendant:
The City of New York, P.O. Pinckney, P.O. Cullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States Of America v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2009cv00490
Plaintiff:
United States Of America, United States Of America, United States Of America and others
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Texas, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lewis v. Schaufler et al
as 2:2009cv01536
Plaintiff:
Steven D Lewis
Defendant:
Bill Schaufler, Stephanie Schaufler, Brett Schaufler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Condon v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv02641
Plaintiff:
Thomas Condon
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Christopher Lindahl and Thomas Grimm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv03192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nathaniel Riley, II v. Mark Bourdon
as 09-1144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL C. RILEY, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK BOURDON, CHARLES M. CONDON, HENRY MCMASTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Riley v. Bourdon et al
as 2:2008cv03899
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Chad Riley
Defendant:
Mark Bourdon, Charles M Condon, Henry McMasters and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
