Cases 1 - 10 of 1,890
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
El v. District Court Clark County et al
as 2:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Rasondo Meeks El
Defendant:
District Court Clark County, Nevada Family Division, Cheryl B Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Angel et al
as 2:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Ortiz
Defendant:
Edgar A Angel, Andrew T Posten and Alabaster, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mundy v. Village of Summit et al
as 1:2024cv04277
Plaintiff:
William Mundy
Defendant:
Village of Summit, Sergio Rodriguez, Jerry Hurckes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stusalitus v. Herrera,
as 2:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Leon Barcley Stusalitus
Defendant:
Kelvin L Wright, Angelique Herrera, Officer Angelique Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question-Violation of Due Process
Collazo v. Ruiz-Feliciano, et al
as 24-1478
Plaintiff:
ODETTE LOPEZ COLLAZO, MARITZA FONT ORTIZ and VERANIA CRESPO CRUZ
Defendant:
WILFREDO RUIZ-FELICIANO, LUIS VELEZ, NANCY LABOY and others
Ortiz et al v. DCFS et al
as 1:2024cv04139
Plaintiff:
Ana Ortiz, Anthony Ortiz and Antonio Bryant
Defendant:
DCFS, Ruth Mejias, Theresa Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
