Cases 1 - 10 of 453
McCracken v. Atkins et al
as 9:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Stewart A. McCracken
Defendant:
Ethan Atkins, Eric Lindauer and Mineral County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Atkins et al
as 5:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Atkins, Augello, Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanwyck v. City of Rhome et al
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Marc Stanwyck
Defendant:
City of Rhome, Eric Debus, Carvan Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Newson v. Douglas et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Richard D. Douglas, Robert W. Wedemeyer, Camille R. McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Phelps v. EAH Housing et al
as 3:2024cv01277
Plaintiff:
Briggett C Phelps
Defendant:
EAH Housing, Yolanda Latrail, Odysey Behavioral Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
