Cases 1 - 10 of 255
Barlow v. Africa Citizen Cled Dorvil, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03648
Plaintiff:
Clinton C. Barlow, III
Defendant:
Africa Citizen Cled Dorvil, LLC, U.S. Immigration Dept., U.S.H.L.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnston v. Epic Systems et al
as 1:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Epic Systems, Gina Appleby, Esther Jiyun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lanier v. Barlow et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Kristi Lanier
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Barlow, Corporal B. A. Shinaberry, Deputy Kendal Ober and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv01137
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hall
Defendant:
BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Donald Licato, Frank Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adcock v. Hopkins County Board Of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Kaylie Adcock
Defendant:
Hopkins County Board Of Education and Elizabeth Barlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
TADESSE v. OREGON STATE CT & COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
YODIT DAGNE TADESSE
Defendant:
OREGON STATE CT & COUNTY, JOHN L. BARLOW, STUBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barlow v. US Customs Border Patrol et al
as 1:2023cv03323
Plaintiff:
Clinton C. Barlow
Defendant:
US Customs Border Patrol, Dundalk Marine Terminal, US Customs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
