Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Catalano v. Starke County of
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Michael Catalano
Defendant:
The County of Starke Indiana and Starke County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toppin et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09584
Plaintiff:
Henisha Toppin, Shjayia Jones and J.T.
Defendant:
City of New York, Marisa Louis-Jean, Brandon Agosto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mello et al v. Gustafson et al
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mello and Rachel Ware
Defendant:
Derek Gustafson, Timothy Vesey, Steven Catalano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Hang et al v. Eric Adams et al
as 1:2023cv05570
Plaintiff:
David Hang and Jennifer Hang
Defendant:
Eric Adams, Edward A. Caban, Deputy Inspector Louron E. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fink v. Catalano
as 23-789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Norman Fink
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Catalano, CCPD, Nathan Moran, Michael Catalano, Cortland City Police Department and others
Marks v. Catalano
as 0:2022cv60659
Plaintiff:
Stephen Marks
Defendant:
Sargent Michael Catalano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Keith Catalano v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2021cv02137
Plaintiff:
Keith Catalano
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Catalano v. Biggs
as 3:2021cv00923
Plaintiff:
Mike Catalano
Defendant:
Starke County Deputy Sheriff Ethan Biggs and Ethan Biggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
