Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Kennedy v. Biden
as 24-30252
Plaintiff: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Childrens Health Defense and Connie Sampognaro
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Karine Jean-Pierre, Vivek H. Murthy and others
Stockton et al v. Ferguson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff: John Stockton, Richard Eggleston, Thomas T Siler and others
Defendant: Robert Ferguson, Kyle S Karinen and John and Jane Does MDs 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kory et al v. Bonta et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff: Pierre Kory, Le Trinh Hoang, Brian Tyson and others
Defendant: Rob Bonta, Reji Varghese and Erika Calderon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, a California Nonprofit corporation et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv04228
Plaintiff: CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, a California Nonprofit corporation, COMFORT GEOFFREY, LEONARD ROBERTS and others
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH and CHERYL BETTIGOLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Kennedy et al v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00381
Plaintiff: Robert F Kennedy, Jr, Children's Health Defense, Connie Sampognaro and others
Defendant: Joseph R Biden, Jr, Karine Jean-Pierre, Vivek H Murthy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Michael Couris, et al v. Kristina Lawson, et al
as 23-55069
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL COURIS and MICHAEL FITZGIBBONS
Defendant / Appellee: KRISTINA D. LAWSON, in her official capacity as President of the Medical Board of California, WILLIAM J. PRASIFKA, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Medical Board of California and ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Intervenor: LETRINH HOANG, D.O., PHYSICIANS FOR INFORMED CONSENT, a not for-profit organization and CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, a California Nonprofit Corporation
Amicus Curiae: INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE, COMPASSION & CHOICES, ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA and others
Mark McDonald, et al v. Kristina Lawson, et al
as 22-56220
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK MCDONALD and JEFF BARKE
Defendant / Appellee: KRISTINA D. LAWSON, in her official capacity as President of the Medical Board of California, RANDY W. HAWKINS, in his official capacity as Vice President of the Medical Board of California, LAURIE ROSE LUBIANO, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Medical Board of California and others
Intervenor: LETRINH HOANG, D.O., PHYSICIANS FOR INFORMED CONSENT, a not for-profit organization and CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, a California Nonprofit Corporation
Amicus Curiae: INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE, COMPASSION & CHOICES, ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA and others
Hoang et al v. Bonta et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02147
Plaintiff: LeTrinh Hoang, Physicians for Informed Consent and Children's Health Defense, California Chapter
Defendant: Rob Bonta and Erika Calderon
Amicus Curiae: ACLU Foundation of Northern California and ACLU Foundation of Southern California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Children's Health Defense Inc., et al
as 22-2970
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHILDRENS HEALTH DEFENSE INC
Defendant / Appellee: RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, BOARD OF GOVERNORS, RUTGERS SCHOOL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES and others
Malcolm Johnson, et al v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35624
Plaintiff / Appellant: MALCOLM JOHNSON, STEPHANIE KAISER, JESSIE CLARK and others
Defendant / Appellee: KATE BROWN, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Oregon and PATRICK ALLEN, in his official capacity as Director of the Oregon Health Authority

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?