Cases 1 - 10 of 68
B. K. v. Santa Monica-Malibu School District
as 24-1594
Plaintiff:
B. K., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, and parent, Aydin Kocataskin and AYDIN KOCATASKIN, as guardian ad litem, and parent for minor, B.K.
Defendant:
SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, COLEEN DAVENPORT, ANTONIO SHELTON and others
EDWARDS v. CHRISTIAN
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
GERALD EDWARDS
Defendant:
COLEEN CHRISTIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lebert (PS) v. USSA et al
as 1:2023cv01937
Plaintiff:
James D. Lebert
Defendant:
USSA, Coleen Parsley, Andrew Solare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
James Rose, Jr. v. Coleen Christian, et al
as 22-2290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. ROSE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COLEEN CHRISTIAN, COUNTY OF BUCKS and BUCKS COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Palmer et al v. Carranza et al
as 1:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Val Palmer and Coleen Palmer
Defendant:
Paul A Carranza, Andrew Heitzman, Adam Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSE v. CHRISTIAN et al
as 5:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. ROSE, JR.
Defendant:
COLEEN CHRISTIAN, BUCKS COUNTY and BUCKS COUNTY PROTHONOTARY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C. Finley v. Gavin Christopher Newsom et al
as 2:2021cv06070
Plaintiff:
C. Finley
Defendant:
Gavin Christopher Newsom, Steven Gordon, Kathleen K. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
