Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Courville v. Richardson et al
as 1:2014cv02190
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Courville
Defendant:
Kathy Richardson , Corrections Corp of America and LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wales v. Corrections Corp of America et al
as 3:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
Ray Wales
Defendant:
Corrections Corp of America, Christopher Aguirre, Chaplain Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Starkweather et al v. Stolc et al
as 2:2009cv00337
Plaintiff:
Justin Starkweather and Lauri Starkweather
Defendant:
Bruno Stolc, Corrections Corp of America, Alaska Corrections, State Deparrtment of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Starkweather et al v. Stolc et al
as 3:2009cv00009
Plaintiff:
Justin Starkweather and Lauri Starkweather
Defendant:
Bruno Stolc, Corrections Corp. of America Inc., State of Alaska Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tester v. Hurm et al
as 5:2008cv00466
Plaintiff:
Paul Ashley Tester
Defendant:
James Hurm, Tammy Osbourne, Randy Stovall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. E A Conway Medical Center et al
as 5:2007cv01966
Plaintiff:
Timothy Karl Jackson
Defendant:
E A Conway Medical Center, Corrections Corp of America, Winn Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Lucas et al
as 1:2007cv01331
Plaintiff:
James Brown
Defendant:
Virgil Lucas, Tim Keith and Correctional Corp of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
