Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 241
Li v. Su et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff: Bing Hong Li
Defendant: Ming Ming Su, Patrick Li, US Department of States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dahlstrom v. Biden et al
as 2:2024cv00641
Defendant: Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr, United States of America, Merrick B Garland and others
Plaintiff: Raju AT Dahlstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bouaddallah v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff: Richard Bouaddallah
Defendant: US Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983 Civil Forfeiture Proceedings
Malik v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2024cv00145
Plaintiff: Attiya Malik
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Auguste et al v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 8:2024cv00066
Plaintiff: Cherryl Auguste, Davoriian Auguste, Kerome Brown, Jr. and others
Defendant: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Auguste et al v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff: Cherryl Auguste, Davoriian Auguste, Kerome Brown, Jr. and others
Defendant: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Lovelady v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00075
Plaintiff: Christopher Lovelady
Defendant: United States Customs and Border Protection and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ms. L. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00428
Respondent: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, Greg Archambeault and others
Petitioner: Ms. L., Ms. C., Dora and others
Not Classified By Court: Lesbi Martinez-Martinez and Ms. M. D-L
Amicus Curiae: Michael Wishnie, et al., amici curiae, Children's Rights., Inc., et al., amici curiae and Scholars of Habeas Corpus and Constitutional Law
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Mohammad Ahmed v. Charles Gable, IV, et al
as 23-5281
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mohammad Mokhtar Ahmed, A Natural Born United States Citizen, Honorable United States Marine, United States Marine Corps Veteran, a Service-Connected United States Veteran
Defendant / Appellee: Charles H. Gable, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, Person, Christopher A. Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a Person, in his official capacity, David M. Banning, a Colonel in the United States Marine Corps, in his official capacity; a Person and others
Abdirahman Kariye, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 23-55790
Plaintiff / Appellant: ABDIRAHMAN ADEN KARIYE, MOHAMAD MOUSLLI and HAMEEM SHAH
Defendant / Appellee: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, STEVE K. FRANCIS, Acting Executive Associate Director, Homeland Security Investigations, in his official capacity and others
Defendant: MARK MORGAN, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?