Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Dreyer v. United States Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 1:2023cv09407
Plaintiff:
JANE (A PSEUDONYM) DOE, Jane Doe and Danielle Dreyer
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration, Merrick B. Garland, Anne Milgram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sx Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-20399
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1528
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Becker et al v. US Department of Justice-Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 0:2018cv60146
Plaintiff:
Michael Becker and Corinne Mei
Defendant:
US Department of Justice-Drug Enforcement Administration, Charlotte Wroblewski, Jason Wroblewski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chen v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv07230
Plaintiff:
Xineng Chen
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
