Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-35414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ALLEN et al v. SCHAFER, et al
as 1:2009cv01422
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN, GWENDOLYN ANDERSON, HENRY ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER and THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
THE DERON SCHOOL OF NEW JERSEY, INC. et al v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 2:2009cv03477
Plaintiff:
THE DERON SCHOOL OF NEW JERSEY, INC., ELO INCORPORATED, KDDS INC. and others
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ED SCHAFER, THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-35038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JAMES et al v. SCHAFER
as 1:2008cv02220
Plaintiff:
MARY JAMES, BEN ALLEN, ROOSEVELT GATERS and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gail Watson Chiang, et al v. Ed Schafer
as 08-4256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIRGIN ISLANDS CLASS PLANTIFFS, GAIL WATSON CHIANG and DENISE PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ED SCHAFER, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
