Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Jones v. Shook et al
as 2:2024cv02061
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Captain Jacob Shook, Lieutenant Samantha Smith, Emily Hanuska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ezell v. McCann
as 2:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamell Ezell, Lena M Jones, Brandy Jones and others
Defendant:
Shawna McCann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Bobinger et al v. Jackson County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Delilah Bobinger and Steven Waller
Defendant:
Jackson County, Mississippi, Jackson County Sheriff's Office, Jackson County Adult Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
CLERVRAIN et al v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, WESLINE CASIR, BERTONIA EDWARD and others
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, MARCO RUBIO, NIKKI FRIED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bivines v. City of Pascagoula, Mississippi et al
as 1:2022cv00072
Defendant:
Walter Ezell, City of Pascagoula, Mississippi, Matt Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Lakesha Bivines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randolph v. Brown et al
as 1:2021cv04401
Plaintiff:
Joshua Randolph
Defendant:
Ezell Brown, Deputy Timothy Smith, Major Sammy Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
