Cases 1 - 10 of 40
TICE v. WILSON et al.
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT TICE
Defendant:
HARRY E. WILSON, PA STATE POLICE, MEGAN'S LAW SECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUMPHREY v. MOODY et al
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JAMES MOODY, ASHLEY KERN and RODNEY FOULKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foulk v. Flagstar Bank et al
as 3:2023cv02864
Plaintiff:
Frank Foulk
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank and Alessandro Deinello
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Pintaro v. Granada et al
as 1:2023cv02008
Plaintiff:
Jerome A. Pintaro
Defendant:
Gerald Granada, Catherine M Levine, Evelyn Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mary Foulke, et al v. Daniel Weller, et al
as 22-13942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY FOULKE and JACK YOUNG, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL WELLER, JOSHUA LAVOIE, LUKE MCCRACKEN and others
HAMPTON v. LITTLE CAESARS ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01582
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAMPTON
Defendant:
LITTLE CAESARS ENTERPRISES, INC., PHOENIX NEXUS, YAEDON LC LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
FOULKE v. WELLER et al
as 3:2020cv05506
Defendant:
JACOB HOLLOWAY, JOSHUA LAVOIE, DANIEL WELLER and others
Plaintiff:
MARY FOULKE and JACK YOUNG, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Foulks v. City of Detroit et al
as 3:2020cv10302
Defendant:
Officer Rossignol, Officer Eric Campbell, City of Detroit and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Foulks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Kreger-Mueller, Valerie v. Withee, Daniel et al
as 3:2019cv00741
Defendant:
Ryan Roettger, Michael Ash, Tyler Loether and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie Kreger-Mueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
