Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Adaeze Nwosu v. Dabney Friedrich, et al
as 24-5124
Plaintiff:
Adaeze Nwosu
Defendant:
Dabney L. Friedrich, Judge and Michelle Grady
Covington v. Humphries, et al
as 24-1158
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH COVINGTON, individually, and as next friend and parent of J.M.H., a minor child
Defendant:
JOHN HUMPHRIES, an individual, JILL BETZ, in her capacity as a social worker/caseworker for San Miguel County Department of Human Services, CAROL FRIEDRICH, in her capacity as the current director of San Miguel County Department of Human Services and others
NWOSU v. FRIEDRICH et al
as 1:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
ADAEZE NWOSU
Defendant:
DABNEY FRIEDRICH and MICHELLE GRADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Friedrich Lu v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC
as 23-3135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant / Appellee:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Lu v. Kastner, et al
as 23-1731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant / Appellee:
ENRIGHT, PAUL V. KASTNER, KASTNER REALTY TRUST and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Lu v. Kastner et al
as 1:2023cv10951
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
Paul V Kastner, Kastner Realty Trust, Enright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Covington v. Humphries et al
as 1:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Covington
Defendant:
John Humphries, Jill Betz, Carol Friedrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Schiller, Victoria v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Victoria Schiller
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Sheila Reiff, Carlos Esqueda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
