Cases 1 - 10 of 150
Jarett v. Garnett, Kansas, City of, et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reese Jarett and Reese Jarett
Defendant:
Garnett, Kansas, City of, Anderson County, Kansas, Les McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Praxis Housing Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02703
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Praxis Housing Initiatives, Inc. and Shauntee Garnett
Doe v. Praxis Housing Initiatives, Inc. (Praxis) et al
as 1:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Praxis Housing Initiatives, Inc. (Praxis) and Shauntee Garnett
Johnson v. City of Marshall, Texas
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Garnett Johnson
Defendant:
City of Marshall, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Leadership Institute et al v. Stokes et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Leadership Institute and Turning Point USA
Defendant:
Garnett Stokes, Joseph Silva, Timothy Stump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cohen v. Iowa City, Iowa et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Emily Cohen
Defendant:
Iowa City, Iowa, Johnson County Sheriff's Department, Johnson County, Iowa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Tamer Mahmoud v. Monifa McKnight
as 23-1890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMER MAHMOUD, ENAS BARAKAT, JEFF ROMAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MONIFA B. MCKNIGHT, SHEBRA L. EVANS, LYNNE HARRIS and others
Amicus Curiae:
DOUGLAS LAYCOCK, Professor, HELEN M. ALVARE, Professor, THOMAS C. BERG, Professor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
