Cases 1 - 10 of 287
Monene-Wilkerson v. Hinton et al
as 2:2024cv03942
Plaintiff:
Ifeoma Moneme-Wilkerson
Defendant:
Omar Hinton and Alexandra Forrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hinton v. Adams
as 4:2024cv04168
Defendant:
Jason Adams
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Hinton v. Jorgenson et al
as 4:2024cv04161
Defendant:
Dustin Jorgenson and Jason Fatson
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Hinton v. Spokane County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2024cv00284
Defendant:
Clay Hilton, John Nowels, City of Spokane Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00228
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hinton v. Jorgenson
as 4:2024cv04150
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hinton
Defendant:
Dustin Jorgenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hinton et al v. Gaspar et al
as 4:2024cv11603
Plaintiff:
Dartanion Edwards, C'Quan Michael Hinton and Gina Edwards
Defendant:
Lee Ann Gaspar and Flint, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatten v. Elkin et al
as 2:2024cv01102
Plaintiff:
Arlene F. Hatten
Defendant:
Tom Elkin, John Hinton, Davis Homer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
