Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DHANI v. HAMILTON COUNTY DRAINAGE BOARD et al
as 1:2024cv01405
Defendant:
MARK E HEIRBRANDT, STEVEN C. DILLINGER, KENTON C. WARD and others
Plaintiff:
HARVINDER SINGH DHANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dhani v. Hamilton County Drainage Board
as 1:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Harvinder Singh Dhani
Defendant:
Hamilton County Drainage Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp Fed. Question: Violation of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kambala et al v. Signal International LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02297
Plaintiff:
Srinivasa Rao Kambala , Srinivasa Rao Gonna , Amandeep Singh Kang and others
Defendant:
Signal International LLC , Signal International, Inc. , Signal International Texas, G.P. and others
Cross_claimant:
Signal International LLC , Signal International, Inc. , Signal International Texas, L.P. and others
Cross_defendant:
Indo-Ameri Soft L.L.C., J & M Associates of Mississippi, Inc., J&M Marine & Industrial, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kambala et al v. Signal International LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00498
Plaintiff:
Srinivasa Rao Kambala , Srinivasa Rao Gonna , Amandeep Singh Kang and others
Defendant:
Signal International LLC, Signal International, Inc., Signal International Texas, G.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00768
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
