Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Romero v. Shields Health Care Group Inc
as 1:2023cv11498
Plaintiff:
Luis Angel Romero
Defendant:
Shields Health Care Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01196
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad
Roberts v. Paris Regional Medical Center et al
as 2:2018cv00191
Plaintiff:
Derrick Roberts
Defendant:
Paris Regional Medical Center, Regionalcare Hospital Partners, Inc., Paris Health Care Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patterson v. Stark County, Ohio et al
as 5:2017cv01699
Plaintiff:
James Patterson
Defendant:
Stark County, Ohio, George T. Maier, Lt. Ady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
William Galloway v. Timothy Swanson, et al
as 12-3367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM P. GALLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY A. SWANSON, STARK COUNTY, MICHAEL MCDONALD, Chief, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE GROUP, INC., et al.
Galloway v. Swanson et al
as 5:2009cv02834
Plaintiff:
William P. Galloway
Defendant:
Timothy A Swanson, Stark County, Board of Commissioners, Michael McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
