Cases 1 - 10 of 14
McCabe v. Trump et al
as 1:2023cv09396
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo McCabe
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Sam Bankman-Fried and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEEUGENIO et al v. BOROUGH OF GLASSBORO et al
as 1:2019cv20521
Defendant:
HECTOR CABEZAS, ANNA MILLER, JOHN AND JANE DOE 1-20 (FICTITIOUS NAMES) and others
Plaintiff:
DR. LEWIS DEEUGENIO, JR. and SUMMIT CITY FARMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12292
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banoro Garrett v. R. Weiler
as 14-1364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BANORO GARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT R. H. WEILER, SERGEANT R. D. LEWIS, ROBERT J. MCCABE and others
Defendant:
NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT, NORFOLK SHERIFF'S OFFICE, THE CITY OF NORFOLK and others
Banoro Garrett v. The Norfolk Police Department
as 13-1092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BANORO GARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT, NORFOLK SHERIFF'S OFFICE, THE CITY OF NORFOLK and others
Romious v. Brooks and Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv03033
Plaintiff:
Carlos Romious
Defendant:
Brooks and Associates, Inc., Chris Brooks, Thomas Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. McCabe et al
as 0:2011mc61763
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Smith
Defendant:
Robert J. McCabe, Cpl. Baldwin, Mr. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jeffrey McCabe v. Patrick Hart, et al
as 08-17264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY J. MCCABE
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK J. HART, RONALD L. CALHOUN and THE COUNTY OF KINGS, CA.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
