Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Eric Garland v. Hon. Mary Schroeder, et al
as 24-1698
Plaintiff:
Eric Garland
Defendant:
Hon. Mary Bruntrager Schroeder, in her individual capacity, Hon. John R. Lasater, in his individual capacity, David Q. Betz, Esq. and others
Brooks v. Hubbell et al
as 2:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
James L. Brooks
Defendant:
Reno Police Dept., Paul Hubbell, D. Tallman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garland v. Schroeder et al
as 4:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Eric Garland
Defendant:
Hon. Mary B. Schroeder, Hon. John R. Lasater, David Q. Betz, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
T.D.H. v. Middletown Borough Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv01459
Plaintiff:
T.D.H. and Ms. Henderson
Defendant:
Middletown Borough Police Department, Juan J. Castro, Scott Tantlinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Pfzifer et al
as 1:2020cv00605
Defendant:
C. Pfzifer, R. Escobedo, J. Castro and others
Plaintiff:
Lance R. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castro-De Leon v. Mastec Utility Sevices
as 3:2019cv02038
Plaintiff:
Elias J Castro-De Leon
Defendant:
Mastec Utility Sevices, Mastec, Y Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Johnny Lawrence v. J. Castro, et al
as 18-15870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY M. LAWRENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
J. CASTRO, I. MEADOWS, J. CHRISTENSEN and others
Lawrence v. Castro et al
as 3:2018cv00091
Defendant:
J. Castro, J. Christensen, I. Meadows and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Madrid Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bullock v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2017cv12685
Plaintiff:
Christanna Bullock
Defendant:
City of Detroit , J. Castro and Other Unnamed Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
