Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act - Enforcement
Bell et al v. Unknown named IRS employee author of I.R.M. 25.25.10-1 et al
as 2:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Bell, United States ex rel, United States of America ex rel and others
Defendant:
Unknown named IRS employee author of I.R.M. 1, Neil Schoonmaker, IRS employee number 1000143350 and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Bell v. Intergen Health Management
as 1:2022cv09140
Plaintiff:
James Bell
Defendant:
Intergen Health Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bell v. Ambutrans
as 1:2022cv09126
Plaintiff:
James Bell
Defendant:
Ambutrans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bell v. Intergen Health Management
as 1:2022cv07338
Plaintiff:
James Bell
Defendant:
Intergen Health Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EDGE v. HAWKINS et al
as 1:2020cv02668
Defendant:
JAMES BELL, MIKE HART, RYAN MEARS and others
Plaintiff:
VINSON L. EDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REEVES et al v. EMPIRE BLENDED PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv09058
Defendant:
EMPIRE BLENDED PRODUCTS, INC., JAY GORNITZKY and JOHN DOES 1-100
Plaintiff:
TROY REEVES, ERIC SWAIN, WRIGHT L MOSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Garza v. City of New Braunfels, Texas et al
as 5:2020cv00041
Plaintiff:
Joseph Neil De La Garza
Defendant:
Officer James Bell, Officer Cody Bianchi, Officer Derek Woelfel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
De La Garza v. City of New Braunfels, Texas et al
as 5:2019cv01455
Plaintiff:
Joseph Neil De La Garza
Defendant:
James Bell, Donald Kimbrell, Cody Bianchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
