Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
RODGERS et al v. MORGAN et al
as 3:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
BROWN JAMES RODGERS, JR. and SHEILA RODGERS
Defendant:
DAVID MORGAN and DAVID INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cheatham v. City of Tallassee et al
as 2:2011cv00672
Plaintiff:
Fermon Stewart Cheatham
Defendant:
City of Tallassee , Tallassee Police Department , James Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Infante et al v. Lyons et al
as 1:2009cv04915
Plaintiff:
Miguel Infante, Miguel Infante, Miguel Infante and others
Defendant:
Village of Lyons, James Rodgers and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowie et al v. State of Maryland, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2007cv01206
Plaintiff:
LA Bowie, LA Bowie, Damon Bowie and others
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, State of Maryland, Maryland Division of Correction, James Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Receiver:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
