Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv01615
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Fani Willis, Elizabeth Jean Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jack Smith v. Krista Koenig et al
as 2:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Jack Smith
Defendant:
Krista Koenig and David Kneller
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00209
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
B. et al v. Board of Education of Montgomery County et al
as 8:2019cv00114
Defendant:
Jack Smith (in his capacity as Superintendent of Montgomery County Public Schools), Board Of Education Of Montgomery County and Dr. Jack Smith
Plaintiff:
O. B., Y. B. and S. B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eclips v. Volland et al
as 3:2018cv00169
Defendant:
Ronald Dupuis, Jack Smith, Erin Motyka and others
Plaintiff:
Luna Eclips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00614
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Civil Rights Education Amendments Act 1972
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
