Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Doe v. Ferguson
as 24-40231
Plaintiff:
John Doe, individually and as next friends of Janie Doe 1 and Janie Doe 2, Minor children and Jane Doe, individually and as next friends of Janie Doe 1 and Janie Doe 2, minor children
Defendant:
Holly Ferguson and Annamarie Hamrick
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Janie Doe, et al v. Walton Verona Board of Educati, et al
as 13-6267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANIE DOE, JOHN DOE and ELIZABETH DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTON VERONA BOARD OF EDUCATION, VANCE SULLIVAN, BILL BOYLE and others
Defendant:
KENTUCKY HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and JOHN ANDERSON
Joyce et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv03397
Plaintiff:
Judy Joyce and Ex Rel Janie Doe
Defendant:
City of New York , Brian Schumacher and John and Jane Does # 1-15
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. Walton Verona Board of Education et al
as 2:2011cv00171
Plaintiff:
Janie Doe , John Doe and Elizabeth Doe
Defendant:
Walton Verona Board of Education, Kentucky High School Athletic Association , Vance Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv06003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MACK v. LEVINSON et al
as 1:2007cv00774
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MACK
Defendant:
DANIEL LEVINSON and JOHN AND JANIE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
