Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mark Moskowitz et al v. Jeffrey Brooks et al
as 2:2023cv04128
Plaintiff:
Mark R Moskowitz and Nancy Parris Moskowitz
Petitioner:
Saintfield Holdings
Defendant:
Jeffrey Brooks, Clyde Turner, Turner Investments and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROOKS v. MURPHY
as 1:2016cv00170
Plaintiff:
MARC JEFFREY BROOKS
Defendant:
LARRY MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROOKS v. LAYTON et al
as 1:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
MARC JEFFREY BROOKS
Defendant:
NIKOLAS LAYTON, STEVEN PARKS and TWO OTHER OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROOKS v. COMMISSION OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GUIDELINES POLICY
as 1:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
MARC JEFFREY BROOKS
Defendant:
COMMISSION OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GUIDELINES POLICY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00817
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Brooks
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer John Cruz, Police Sergeant John Cui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
BROOKS et al v. ZANZUCCKI
as 3:2010cv01349
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BROOKS and BULLETPROOF ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
FRANK ZANZUCCKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brooks et al v. The United States Trotting Association et al
as 1:2010cv01288
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Brooks and Bulletproof Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
The United States Trotting Association and Michael Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kate Mills, et al v. Walter Rodabaugh, et al
as 10-1167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATE MILLS and ANDREW MILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTER RODABAUGH, JEFFREY BROOKS and COUNTY OF LAPEER
Mills v. Rodabaugh et al
as 2:2009cv10921
Defendant:
Walter Rodabaugh, Jeffrey Brooks and Lapeer, County of
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
