Cases 1 - 10 of 77,312
Respess et al v. VMI Alumni Association
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William L. Respess, Dean Barr, Hugh P. Brien and others
Defendant:
VMI Alumni Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Doe (JDC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
John Doe (JDC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
San Juana Rodriguez-Gonzalez et al v. County of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2024cv04685
Plaintiff:
San Juana Rodriguez-Gonzalez, J. Luis Duron-Luevano and Miguel Angel Duron-Rodriguez
Defendant:
County of Santa Barbara, Shawn Lammer, Deputy John Hartly Freedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Demetrius John Brown
Defendant:
Glorimar Sanchez, Julie Patterson, Darwin Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TAYLOR v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01643
Plaintiff:
CHARMAIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
TARIQUE ROBERTS and JOHN DOE
Resendiz v. Christian et al
as 1:2024cv02452
Plaintiff:
Diana Resendiz
Defendant:
Officer Demetrius Christian, Clayton County, Georgia and John Doe(s) 1-3
Whitfield v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04667
Plaintiff:
Corris A Whitfield
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Officer John J. Salinas, Anthony Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Panabaker et al v. Hood River
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Ruston Panabaker, Sheri Panabaker, John J Hutson and others
Defendant:
City of Hood River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
John Doe (RLM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RLM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
