Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16776
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Westry v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Eric Westry
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Ned Lamont, Jeanette Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv07995
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ralph Smith, Jr. v. James Hood, III, et al
as 17-60122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH ARNOLD SMITH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. HOOD, III, In his individual capacity, ALBERT LEE ABRAHAM, JR., Individually, CYNTHIA T. EUBANK, In her individual capacity and others
Rebello et al v. Budimlic et al
as 1:2016cv02484
Defendant:
Police Officer Christopher Acquilino, Detective Sergeant Aquilina, Police Officer Joseph Avanzato and others
Plaintiff:
Fernando Rebello, Jessica Rebello, Nella Rebello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rebello et al v. Budimlic et al
as 2:2016cv02484
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ACQUILINO, Det. AQUILINA, JOSEPH AVANZATO and others
Plaintiff:
Fernando Rebello, Jessica Rebello, Adminstratror Nella Rebello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. v. Hood et al
as 3:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Ralph Arnold Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
James M. Hood , Albert Lee Abraham, Jr. , Cynthia T. Eubank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01798
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
John Tucker v. Fred Dodd et al
as 8:2012cv01299
Defendant:
Fred Dodd, Jane Doe, Ranger Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
John Tucker
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
