Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Mills v. Dye et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mills
Defendant:
Darrell DJ Dye, Perry County, Mississippi, Mitch Nobles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OLIVEIRA v CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD et al
as 1:2023cv20838
Plaintiff:
danielle oliveira
Defendant:
CITY OF WILDWOOD, CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD, NORTH WILDWOOD PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mills v. Dye et al
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mills
Defendant:
Darrell DJ Dye, John Doe Officers 1-10 and John Doe Entities 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
PASQUALE et al v. BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE et al
as 2:2023cv02752
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS M PASQUALE and DIANE PASQUALE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE, PAUL MIRABELLI, JOSEPH GIANNUZZI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reeners v. Jouvence et al
as 3:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jayson Reeners
Defendant:
Michelle Landry Jouvence, Mary Guneug, Pascal Claude Jouvence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Burghart et al v. South Correctional Entity et al
as 2:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
Charleen Burghart and Lawrence Dolan
Defendant:
South Correctional Entity, John Doe Cantu, NaphCare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
