Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00694
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021xc01197
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
KIRBY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv02327
Plaintiff:
BARRY KIRBY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , JOSEPH B. MOORE and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. City of Chicago Park District et al
as 1:2015cv03014
Plaintiff:
Zachary Ferguson
Defendant:
City of Chicago Park District, Bryan Traubert, Avis LaVelle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Committe to Preserve Voting Rights et al v. Chicago Board of Election Commissioners et al
as 1:2014cv07749
Plaintiff:
Committe to Preserve Voting Rights, Bruce E. Crosby, William K. Crosby and others
Defendant:
Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, Langdon D. Neal, Richard A. Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Trazell v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2014cv01001
Plaintiff:
Delonte Trazell
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Rand Beers, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Moore v. City of St. Augustine, Florida
as 3:2012cv00797
Plaintiff:
Joseph V. Moore
Defendant:
City of St. Augustine, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
