Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bass v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Linh N. Bass and Monglinh Ngo Bass
Defendant:
Joshua Jackson, Jason Schmoker, Kenneth Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Carlene Jones, Talease Gaither and Sharonda Finch
Defendant:
Baltimore Police Department, Clayton Leak, Matthew Tobjy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
SCHLOSS et al v. BOROUGH OF HIGHTSTOWN et al
as 3:2022cv06905
Plaintiff:
NEIL SCHLOSS, KPM HOLDINGS, LLC and CANNASENSE DISPENSARY, INC.
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF HIGHTSTOWN, Councilperson JOE CICALESE, MAYOR LAWRENCE D. QUATTRONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Fuentez v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Cesar Fuentez
Defendant:
City of Austin, John Doe, Limary Barajas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lisa Mims, et al v. J. Oliver
as 17-20579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA MIMS and JOSHUA JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. D. OLIVER
Lisa Mims, et al v. J. Oliver, et al
as 17-20267
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LISA MIMS and JOSHUA JACKSON
Defendant - Appellant:
J. D. OLIVER
Appellant:
DEBRA V. JENNINGS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01665
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims et al v. Oliver et al
as 4:2015cv00644
Plaintiff:
Lisa Mims and Joshua Jackson
Defendant:
JD Oliver and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fluker v. Jackson
as 1:2013cv04064
Plaintiff:
Tracy Fluker
Defendant:
Joshua Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
