Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Barker v. Gaylor et al.
as 2:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Anthony L. Gaylor, Shaun McClure, City of Charleston and others
Plaintiff:
Johny L. Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00502
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Marcus Carey v. Stephen Wolnitzek, et al
as 08-6538
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
MARCUS CAREY
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
STEPHEN DALE WOLNITZEK, in his official capacity as Chairperson of the Kentucky Judicial Conduct Commission, MICHELLE M. KELLER, in her official capacity as a member of the Kentucky Judicial Conduct Commission, JAMES L. BOWLING, JR., in his official capacity as a member of the Kentucky Judicial Conduct Commission and others
Defendant:
STEPHEN N. FRAZIER, in his official capacity as a member of the Kentucky Judicial Conduct Commission
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF OHIO and STATE OF MICHIGAN
Marcus Carey v. Stephen Wolnitzek, et al
as 08-6468
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
MARCUS CAREY
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
STEPHEN L. BARKER, in his official capacity as chairperson of Panel C of the Kentucky Inquiry Commission, JAMES L. BOWLING, JR., in his official capacity as chairperson of Panel C of the Kentucky Inquiry Commission, LINDA A. GOSNELL, in her official capacity as chairperson of Panel C of the Kentucky Inquiry Commission and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN N. FRAZIER, in his official capacity as a member of the Kentucky Judicial Conduct Commission
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF OHIO and STATE OF MICHIGAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
